Staying Alive

Survival is our politics now. So says French political anthropologist Marc Abélès in The Politics of Survival. And so say many cultural producers today, although this admission often comes by way of what cultural theorist Fredric Jameson called the political unconscious more than through any overt acknowledgement of the true character and gravity of the crises we confront today.

Take Ridley Scott’s recent film Prometheus, for example. The film is a prequel to Alien (1979), a film which shared a great deal in common with previous Cold War-era paranoid movies such as Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956).

Of course, Alien was a film of its time. The movie’s focus on the biopolitical threat of contagion was clearly influenced by the ecological crisis of the 1970s and by previous works of biopolitical horror such as Michael Crichton’s The Andromeda Strain (1969). In addition, the bad-ass heroine Ellen Ripley was very much a product of second-wave feminism.

Nonetheless, just as in earlier films of paranoid American empire such as Invasion of the Body Snatchers, Scott’s Alien features a hapless crew of (multicultural but clearly American) explorers who stumble upon an alien horde that subsequently annihilates them. The message seems to be that the expansion of U.S. capitalism can bring its agents – the crew members of the spaceship Nostromo (in a nice reference to Joseph Conrad) are bringing a freight of iron ore back to Earth – into contact with threatening populations of aliens. But it is the survival of this small group of explorers alone that is at issue.

Contrast this with Prometheus. In Scott’s prequel, released thirty three years after the original, it is the survival of humanity itself that is at stake.

In Prometheus, we find out that the aliens which Ripley battled are the product of a toxic biological weapon engineered by a race of god-like extraterrestrials who, having created humanity, have now decided to wipe us out for some inexplicable reason. The struggles of archeologist Elizabeth Straw to survive the various alien threats that assail her thus stand in for the struggle of humanity itself to stay alive.

One could perhaps say that the inscrutable motives of the “Engineers” who created us and now seem bent on our destruction in Prometheus might stand in for our planet’s environment, which seems to be turning against us with increasing virulence and unleashing multiple unanticipated plagues upon us. This is perhaps stretching allegory a bit far, but the crux of the film is indisputably the struggle for species survival, a marked shift from the earlier Alien films.

The obsession with survival in contemporary U.S. culture is virtually inescapable. Soon after seeing Prometheus, I wandered into Amie Siegel’s exhibition Black Moon (2012) in the Austin Museum of Art. Siegel’s video installation offers a powerful evocation of the current obsession with apocalyptic and post-apocalyptic scenarios. Long panning shots through blighted suburban housing developments in what appears to be Phoenix or some other city of the Southwest evoke the sub-prime mortgage-fueled bust.

Erupting into this bleak landscape of politically engineered economic abandonment, a small band of women guerrillas struggles to survive an unnamed and invisible nemesis.

Like Scott’s Prometheus, Siegel’s video exhibition remixes an original from the 1970s, in this case Louis Malle’s film Black Moon. Siegel’s piece updates the original, though, by situating the unexplained civil war in the context of neoliberal blight. Like Scott’s film, Siegel’s work also focuses on women as protagonists. The exhibition shares a great deal with Sarah Hall’s dystopian novel The Carhullan Army (2007), in which a commune of radical feminists takes to the Scottish highlands in order to survival the ecologically driven collapse of modern society.

This kind of apocalyptic narrative exerts such as strong appeal on the contemporary political unconscious, I want to argue, precisely because of the absence of genuine acknowledgement of the gravity of the crises that confront us in mainstream discourse.

The exhaustion of the neoliberal model of capitalism has been addressed by elites since the onset of the present crisis in 2008 by wave after wave of heightened austerity that is doing nothing but exacerbating the crisis, as well as drowning average people in misery. The political systems in both the U.S. and E.U. seem gripped by total gridlock, with rule being carried out in Europe by conservative bankers whose feckless measures have plunged the economic union into interminable crisis. Meanwhile, in the U.S., a political system riddled with corruption as a result of the influence of big money has spiraled into previously unknown extremes of partisanship and polarization. And, of course, underlying these crises, we continue to push the planet through incremental increases in carbon emissions into a climate crisis from which there is likely to be no exit for the vast majority of humanity.

There is, of course, little substantial admission of these crises in mainstream discourse, let alone an attempt to grapple with the kind of serious, systemic transformations that would be necessary in order to stem our current headlong rush towards oblivion.

Given this fact, the apocalyptic political unconscious proffered by films such as Prometheus can often seem very attractive. Hell, at least someone is willing to admit we’re in deep shit.

There are, nonetheless, significant dangers associated with such an outlook. As Eddie Yuen and the other contributors to the forthcoming volume Catastrophism point out, apocalyptic thinking distorts our understanding of the organic crisis faced by contemporary civilization. As a result, such thinking more often impedes rather than fuels progressive responses to crisis. In fact, if catastrophism has any basic DNA, it is in the apocalyptic thinking of fundamentalist religious movements, which tend to be animated in their responses to crisis by highly reactionary social mores.

The challenge we face, then, is to survey and help the multitude understand the depth of the crisis we currently face, while not giving in to apocalyptic rhetoric. We cannot afford to wait for the slate to be wiped clean before we build new, sustainable societies. That battle has to be waged in the present, through initiatives both pragmatic and visionary enough to engage people in genuine campaigns of hope.

Advertisements

12 Comments

Filed under class war, environment, gender, imperialism, sexuality

12 responses to “Staying Alive

  1. Mia

    What great post! Lots to comment!

    On Survival:

    I think that the sense of survival is inherent to human nature… as fear! Because if we have a look at History we have always tried to survived, always feared… An enemy… In the twentieth century communism used to be the enemy, etc. nowadays global society presents to us other types of challenges and enemies: terrorism, climate change, poverty… The economy! However, Survival has for me different dimensions: material and spiritual… Also the nuances change whether it is Western societies or other parts of the globe!! Sometimes it is said that Western civilization suffers a kind of “spiritual” decadence – values, etc.-. So survival also has to do with spirituality… Because our civilization and power – in the positive sense- has a lot to do with good values… We can’t survive without them – at least in our humanity-, if we don’t wanna become primitive or robots…

    On Apocaliptic style in movies, politics, etc.
    That’s what is dominant whenever we open a newspaper, watch the news and even in this movies, documentaries you ve brilliantly mentioned… It seems as the end of the world… Now because or the financial crisis, etc.
    But the real question to me is whether this Apocaliptic environment is provoked by media, etc. Do they wanna make us believe constantly that we have an an enemy? Maybe to exerce some control on the citizens… because we need “religiously” to trust governments, international organizations, etc.

    Yay, I love campaigns of hope! That’s so beautiful, and that’s also the key… I agree that it is essential to avoid the Apocaliptic language and environment and to generate a more positive atmosphere making citizens wanting to get involved in the problems of the ” global ” polity… We are in the path to some sort of civic, peaceful revolution! Love it!

    • Thanks again for your response. You’re totally right that survival means lots of different things to different people. I was thinking as I wrote my post that it connotes totally different things to a kid suffering from asthma in the Bronx or to someone in South Africa who is HIV+ than it does to the characters in the movies I discussed. So you’re right, but I was interested in looking at how the dominant media puts certain ideas about survival in circulation. I think we need to challenge these ideas and craft alternatives.

      • Mia

        Yes, I get your point and fully agree… And the first way to “challenge ideas and craft alternatives” is to denounce them -as you are doing in your blog- to make people aware of “the game”.

      • Mia

        Challenge ideas and craft alternatives…

        I need to think about this… to sleep on it. To challenge ideas we have to focus on the media, TV, etc., and propose other lines of thoughts and approaches.

        That´s why writing something different -in a blog, a book, an article, even fiction in a short story- or talking before an audience, giving a lecture is a start, as cultural changes -in ideas- take a while. The process is slow. There are free talks -I try to go as well- challenging the “general” ideas.

        Craft alternatives. What alternatives?
        I know that nowadays people do not find the time but one way i am figuring out is through engagement, nothing complicated… Just groups of people that gather together with a certain frequency -once a week- and that focus on particular problems: it is important to be specific. For instance, last nite I was with a group of friends and one of them was arguing he sees no way he and her wife can start a family -it is so expensive-. Then I said that there should be more social help -child care centers-, etc. So, here is a new focus this group should work on…

        Another idea i like that we do is called “mutual aid”. I mean any of us offer to help other doing st he or she likes or is good at. It could be something simple such as baby-sitting or more “sophisticated” -depending on each person abilities.

        Sorry, i need another coffee

  2. Mia

    In continuation with your radiant idea synthesized in the formula “campaigns of hope”, I was just thinking of a title for a new book comprising this/ your philosophy… such as “The Politics of Hope”.

  3. Mia

    Hi, another connection for this post could be “Apocalyptic movements” -related to Catastrophism, etc.- Columbia University is holding a series of lectures on that.
    http://globalstrategy.columbia.edu/

    P.S. Sounds scary!

  4. Mia

    Thinking about film – movies you mentioned- but also about contemporary artistic creation evoking apocalyptic… Just came to my mind Thomas Schutte alien worlds.

  5. Mia

    A curiosity:

    I found out by chance that there is another “Politics of Survival” by Aaaron David Miller. This book is focused on the Palestine Liberation Organization and the Israeli-Palestine conflict…

  6. Sassy

    I think humans make too many connections to things that don’t exist. To relate this stuff to the cold war is reading far beyond what anybody intended. It’s like blaming the horr films of the 70 for the turmoil of the 60s. Every decade has their BS. But It’s graspinig at straws because fear is the ultmate teacher that will wire a brain in a second! It’s proven our brains tend to do that. Create patterns that aren’t there…or try to make connections to EVERYTHING to NOTHING. However, what a culture is feeling at a point time is probably a more broader spectrum that translates to it’s art. When we do look back in time..we learn that most of our fears were generated by others who intended to put them there to control or to manipulated what they wanted…..or we created them ourselves…out of misleading data.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s